Clinical outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction according to sex and race.

BACKGROUND: Female sex and South Asian race have been associated with poor clinical outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but remain understudied in large real-world series. We therefore investigated the association of sex and race with clinical outcomes following PPCI. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of all patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI between January 2009 and December 2011 at a large UK cardiac centre. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared according to sex and race using Chi-square test, independent samples Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test. Primary and secondary outcomes were 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) - defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization, analysed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Three thousand and forty-nine patients were included. Women ( n=826) were older than men ( n=2223) (median age 69 vs. 60 years, p <0.01). Mortality (hazard ratio 1.48 (1.15-1.90)) and MACE (hazard ratio 1.40 (1.14-1.72)) were higher in women in univariable analysis. However, there were no significant sex-differences in mortality or MACE after age-stratification alone. Multivariable analysis also showed no significant differences in outcomes between sexes. South Asians ( n=297) were younger but had a higher prevalence of most risk factors than White patients ( n=2570). Mortality and MACE did not differ significantly between South Asian and White patients in univariable or multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: MACE and mortality was not greater in women, or in South Asian patients following PPCI after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors including age, which was most strongly associated with both outcomes.

The national infarct angioplasty project: UK experience and subsequent developments.

The UK had previously established a comprehensive strategy for in-hospital nurse-led thrombolysis for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, with a growing use of pre-hospital thrombolysis by paramedical staff in the ambulance services. The National Infarct Angioplasty Project was sponsored by the government and examined the introduction of primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PPCI) in a variety of urban, rural and mixed communities. The project found that PPCI could be delivered within acceptable timelines, would be cost-effective, and could be delivered to the majority of the population. A project was therefore undertaken in England to transform services. There has been a rapid change and by 2012/13 over 95% of eligible patients received PPCI. Survival of patients with STEMI has improved over time and length of stay in hospital halved. However, nearly a quarter of STEMI patients do not receive reperfusion therapy (often because of late presentation) and additional work is needed to minimise delays to treatment. There are unexplained differences between regions in numbers of PPCI procedures per million population, and there is also variance between centres in the proportion of patients who are in shock or on a ventilator. Additional research is needed to ensure a consistent approach for these sick patients, who might have the most to gain from early treatment. The national audit programmes have been instrumental in measuring the changes in strategies, monitoring performance and highlighting the associated improvements in outcomes. A new risk model is being developed to allow a more comprehensive comparison of outcomes in different hospitals.

Risk stratification for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Acute coronary syndromes presenting with ST elevation are usually treated with emergency reperfusion/revascularisation therapy. In contrast current evidence and national guidelines recommend risk stratification for non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with the decision on revascularisation dependent on perceived clinical risk. Risk stratification for STEMI has no recommendation. Statistical risk scoring techniques in NSTEMI have been demonstrated to improve outcomes however their uptake has been poor perhaps due to questions over their discrimination and concern for application to individuals who may not have been adequately represented in clinical trials. STEMI is perceived to carry sufficient risk to warrant emergency coronary intervention [by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI)] even if this results in a delay to reperfusion with immediate thrombolysis. Immediate thrombolysis may be as effective in patients presenting early, or at low risk, but physicians are poor at assessing clinical and procedural risks and currently are not required to consider this. Inadequate data on risk stratification in STEMI inhibits the option of immediate fibrinolysis, which may be cost-effective. Currently the mode of reperfusion for STEMI defaults to emergency angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention ignoring alternative strategies. This review article examines the current risk scores and evidence base for risk stratification for STEMI patients. The requirements for an ideal STEMI risk score are discussed.

The importance of audit to monitor applications of procedures and improve primary angioplasty results.

Although clinical trials have demonstrated that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) provides better outcomes than thrombolysis for STEMI, it cannot be assumed that similar results can be obtained in day-to-day practice. To determine whether standards are being met, continuous audit of PPCI programmes is necessary, with appropriate feedback to participating centres and operators. Both the MINAP and BCIS national audit projects allow central electronic collection of data on consecutive patients presenting to every hospital involved in the acute management of these patients. Regular programmed feedback is provided to centres performing primary PCI that attempts to take account of statistical variation and differences in case mix between units by making use of funnel plots, statistical process control graphs and risk adjustment models. This reporting of "process" and "outcome" data, both confidentially and within the public domain, has been used to drive up clinical performance and has been associated with steady improvements and reduced inequalities of care.

Developing primary PCI as a national reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the UK experience.

In 2004 in the United Kingdom (UK), the infrastructural and organisational changes required for implementation of primary PCI for treatment of STEMI were unclear, and the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of a changed reperfusion strategy had not been tested. In addition, any proposed change was to be made against the background of a previously successful in-hospital thrombolysis strategy, with plans for greater use of pre-hospital administration. A prospective study (the "National Infarct Angioplasty Project - NIAP") was set up to collect information on all patients presenting with STEMI in selected regions in the UK over a one year period (April 2005 - March 2006). The key findings from the NIAP project included that PPCI could be delivered within acceptable treatment times in a variety of geographical settings and that the shortest treatment times were achieved with direct admission to a PPCI-capable cardiac catheter laboratory. The transformation from a dominant lytic strategy to one of PPCI across the UK was achieved both swiftly and consistently with the help of 28 cardiac networks. By the second quarter of 2011, 94% of those STEMI patients in England who received reperfusion treatment were being treated by PPCI compared with 46% during the third quarter of 2008.

Three-year clinical outcome with the Endeavor™ zotarolimus-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction: the Endeavor™ primary PCI study (E-PPCI).

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is superior to thrombolysis in STEMI (ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) patients. Data on late stent thrombosis (ST) have raised concerns regarding the use of drug-eluting stents during PPCI. We report the first 3-year clinical evaluation of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI, a single-center, prospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted with STEMI. All underwent PPCI within 12 hours of symptoms; each received one or more ZES in one or more target lesions. All patients received aspirin 300 mg, clopidogrel 600 mg, abciximab, and unfractionated heparin. A total of 102 STEMI patients (76 male, mean 62 years) received 162 ZES (mean 1.6 stents/patient). Median call-to-balloon time was 123 (102-152) minutes. Thirty-day combined major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate was 3.9% (n = 4). Subacute ST occurred in 2 patients (1.96%). Combined MACE rates at 12 months and 3 years were 7.8% (n = 8) and 13.7% (n = 14). Late ST occurred in 1 patient (1%) with no occurrence of very late ST. This is the first 3-year report of the use of the ZES in an unselected, consecutive PPCI population. Overall 3-year incidence of MACE and target lesion revascularization (5.9%) was low, and was comparable to that seen with sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in randomized controlled trials. At 3 years there was no occurrence of very late ST.

Real-world outcome from ST elevation myocardial infarction in the very elderly before and after the introduction of a 24/7 primary percutaneous coronary intervention service.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether the superiority of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) over thrombolysis for the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) extends to the very elderly. Furthermore, the deliverability and efficacy of PPCI in over the 80s has not been investigated in a real-world setting. The aim of this study was to compare outcome from STEMI in patients aged > or =80 before and after the introduction of routine 24/7 PPCI. METHODS: Retrospective observational analysis of all patients aged > or =80 presenting with STEMI to 2 neighboring hospitals in the 3-year period after the introduction of a 24/7 PPCI service and in the preceding 2 years when reperfusion therapy was by thrombolysis. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six STEMI patients aged > or =80 were included. After the introduction of PPCI, 84% (136/161) received reperfusion therapy, 73% PPCI, and 12% thrombolysis, compared to 77% ([73/95] 1% PPCI, 76% thrombolysis) previously. Mortality after inception of PPCI was reduced at 12 months (29% vs 41%, P = .04) and 3 years (43% vs 58%, P = .02). Improved outcome was attributable to treatment by PPCI, which was associated with numerically lower 12-month (26% vs 37%, P = .07) and significantly reduced 3-year (42% vs 55%, P = .05) mortality compared to thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCI can be effectively delivered to very elderly patients presenting with ST elevation MI in a real-world setting and leads to a substantial reduction in mortality compared to patients treated by thrombolysis.

Direct ambulance admission to the cardiac catheterization laboratory significantly reduces door-to-balloon times in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) provided it can be delivered within 90 minutes of hospital admission. In clinical practice this target is difficult to achieve. We aimed to determine the effect of direct ambulance admission to the cardiac catheterization laboratory on door-to-balloon and call-to-balloon times in primary PCI. METHODS: We performed a prospective evaluation of a new system of paramedic electrocardiogram diagnosis of STEMI and subsequent direct ambulance admission to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for primary PCI. Door-to-balloon and call-to-balloon times were recorded for all patients. Direct admissions were compared with admissions via the emergency room of the interventional center and of 2 referring hospitals. All times are quoted as medians. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-seven patients (70% male, age 63 +/- 13 years) underwent primary PCI between April 2005 and May 2007. After February 2006, 172 (44%) of 387 patients were admitted directly from the ambulance to the catheterization laboratory. Directly admitted patients had significantly reduced door-to-balloon (58 vs 105 minutes, P < .001) and call-to-balloon times (105 vs 143 minutes, P < .001). The 90-minute target for door-to-balloon time was achieved in 94% of direct admissions compared to 29% of patients referred from the emergency room. CONCLUSIONS: Direct admission of patients with suspected STEMI from the ambulance service to the catheterization laboratory significantly reduces time to treatment in primary PCI and allows the 90-minute door-to-balloon time target to be reliably achieved.